Blog Layout

HISTORIC VICTORY IN UNITED STATES V. LANDA ET. AL.

Spiga & Associates • May 08, 2019
Jury Note — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
Yesterday, May 7th 2019, for the first time in history, the United States lost a major Mexican Mafia conspiracy trial. I was part of that historic victory and I could not be more proud. In United States v. Landa, the government alleged my client, Jose Rodriguez Landa, an alleged Mexican Mafia leader, was the lead conspirator in a plan to unite the Mexican Mafia with the La Familia Drug Cartel. After 7 weeks of testimony and the playing of some 40 hours of video and audio evidence, the jury returned a string of not guilty verdicts starting with my client Jose Rodriguez Landa.

Mr. Landa has been the number one target of Southern California law enforcement for some 8 years. I have been representing Mr. Landa for 6 years and during that time I have been able to defeat both his state and federal cases. However this federal case victory is unprecedented.

The difficulties in representing alleged organized crime Kingpins is immense. The government always exaggerates the defendant’s dangerousness, highlights his tattoos and prison record, calls experts to tell the jury how bad he is, calls informants to tell the jury how guilty he is and by the end of the case, 99/100 times the government is rewarded with a guilty verdict. NOT THIS TIME!

The government’s game plan was anticipated and stymied through great jury selection, concise opening statements, excellent cross examination and persuasive closing arguments. I would like to thank my co-counsel Nicholas Rosenberg, my co-defense counsels Amy Jacks, Mark Windsor, Carlos Iriarte, Humberto Diaz, Kristen Richards and Linden Millard. Special thanks goes out to paralegals Christina Gits and Clark Arnwine. Every person contributed mightily to the miraculous defense win. I could not be more proud than to be associated with this great group of legal professionals.
                                                                             
Carlo A. Spiga
Lead Attorney Jose Rodriguez-Landa


18 Apr, 2023
To better protect yourself as a medical practitioner from medical malpractice cases, read these four common causes of medical injury in the elderly.
Man Talking To A Doctor — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
21 Oct, 2021
Asa mental health professional, you need to understand why a patient or patient's representative has decided to sue you for malpractice. Learn more here.
Doctor Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure of a Patient — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
15 Oct, 2021
Medical errors are an unfortunately common event in the medical industry. Discussed below are six medical errors definitions you should know.
12 Jul, 2021
While uncommon, dental malpractice cases can be costly and time-consuming. See some tips to help avoid or mitigate avoid dental malpractice cases.
Medical records and Stethoscope — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
By Admin 02 Jun, 2021
Even the most careful doctor might make an error that leads to a lawsuit. Check out these three commonly asked questions about medical malpractice.
Group of Doctors — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
03 May, 2021
If you would like to learn more about how to defend yourself, keep reading to learn about three defense strategies for medical malpractice cases.
Doctor with Pens on His Pocket — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
06 Apr, 2021
Doctors put in a lot of effort to earn their medical license, so losing it is usually a cause for alarm. See six reasons a doctor may lose their license.
Doctor And Patient's Hands — Los Angeles, CA — Spiga and Associates
01 Mar, 2021
California laws allow a physician to stop seeing a patient as long as the decision doesn't involve discrimination. Learn how to avoid patient abandonment.
By Carlo A Spiga, Lead Attorney 24 Feb, 2021
You see him or her on your television, in your professional journals, and on your home page . . . the “Poster Child.” The Physician existing on the fringe of the profession, who gets arrested for overwriting prescriptions for Schedule II substances . Their example is easy to dismiss. The average M.D. engaged in legitimate practice seemingly has nothing to worry about. This fate befalls the slacker, the greedy, the foolhardy. Don't be so sure, any M.D. who prescribes Schedule II substances as a regular part of their practice is only one adverse patient outcome away from California Medical Board and possibly criminal investigation. For example, Surgeons and Physicians practicing in Emergency Medicine, Oncology, and Pain Management, routinely write hundreds, if not thousands of prescriptions for Schedule II substances. There is no way for a Physician to control the patient’s use of controlled substances, yet a dangerous and influential myth is being propagated that a physician is a fortune teller and can predict which patients will misuse the substances provided. Further complicating the issue is the difficult ethical landscape navigated by Physicians dealing with patients presenting legitimate symptoms demanding treatment with Schedule II and III substances, but who are nevertheless, drug dependent. Long term pain management patients are at particular risk of overdose due to their high tolerances leading to increasing dosages and the difficulty in weaning them off the substances they have become dependent upon. Should a patient die or suffer an adverse outcome that is somehow connected to a prescription for a schedule II substance, a criminal and California Medical Board investigation is sure to follow. Oftentimes the investigation will be spearheaded by investigators for the California Department of Consumer Affairs working in conjunction with local law enforcement but who also work on behalf of the Medical Board of California. These investigators are sworn peace officers and have the power to arrest and working with the Attorney General or local District Attorney also have the ability to bring criminal charges against a Physician. These investigations start out invisibly with scrutiny of CURES II reports detailing a Physician’s prescription history. All patients receiving scheduled substances will be given particular attention. Soon after, the physician will receive a request for patient records, followed by a letter of investigation from a California Department of Consumer Affairs Investigator indicating that a complaint has been made and requesting an interview. They do not inform the Physician of his or her right to counsel or whether the Physician even has the right to refuse the interview. Nor do they inform him or her of their right to review the complaint. Believe it or not, one of the common mistakes Physicians make in dealing with these investigations is not taking it seriously. They will delay responding or not respond at all. Often Physicians confident in their prescribing practices will have a false sense of confidence going in to such an interview and will wing it without consulting consul. Those Physicians learn the error of that approach through hard experience. If you are facing such an inquiry. Take it very seriously, Your medical license is your most important asset. If you have an adverse patient outcome that has come to the attention of your Hospital Administration, The Medical Board of California or local law enforcement, call Spiga and Associates immediately. Because of our 25 years of experience in both Criminal and Administrative defense we are uniquely qualified to defend you and your medical license.
nurse texting
By Carlo A Spiga, Lead Attorney 24 Feb, 2021
WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN AN INVESTIGATOR ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD CALLS YOU DEMANDING AN INTERVIEW?
More Posts
Share by: